7. C3v20 MW mic1
| Stuart C3v20 STU MW mic1.wav |
Steinway C3v20 STE MW mic1. wav |
| Soundtable 4.15 C3v20 MW mic1 | |
The bass ‘swell’ is enhanced through the added microphones. The attack tone of the Stuart is more immediate, with the higher amplitudes of Fnd. 2nd& 3rd partials.
Array sound:
| Stuart C3v20 STU MW mxd array .wav |
Steinway C3v20 STE MW mxd array .wav |
| Soundtable 4.16 C3v20 MW mxd arry | |
Decay:
The Stuart sound decayed .5 dB/s slower than Steinway in the onset oscillation (i). The Steinway’s transition to its 3rdphase settled oscillation (iii) is approximately 1.5s earlier than Stuart.
|
For C3v20, the Stuart was louder than Steinway at mics 1,2,5,6,7,& 8
Soundboard: At the 4 probe positions, the Stuart soundboard vibrated at 31% greater magnitude than the Steinway soundboard for C3v20. |
| C3v20 130.80 Hz Scaling, Soundboard table 4.7 | |
